Batman Logo

Thursday, September 11, 2014

The Fallacies/Lies of Hutt's Lawsuit

1. To label this as a "class action" lawsuit is an outright lie. This no way represents the consensus feelings of the public or the taxpayers of the city of Jeffersonville. The suit represents a personal vendetta of  Hutt and the other political enemies of Mayor Moore...period.

2. Hutt's comments "this is not about Mike Moore or myself, it is about following state statue and getting the best price for the land" Bull shit, another lie,  in the press release Hutt made a point of mentioning and calling out the mayor personally in his comments. It's all about him getting fired from the exact board he's suing(Redevelopment commission) and politics and everybody knows it but the Moore haters.

3. Hutt's remarks that Merkley's request for a 24 million dollar bond is a "scare tactic" ...another lie. This is a standard procedure and request in this type suit. This keeps any dumb ass like Hutt from filing a frivolous lawsuits and holding up million dollar projects. The amount might change but the bond should and will be put in place...then we will see how serious Hutt is, he can either  put up or shut up....

4. There is no end game in Hutt's suit, he ask's for the hotel "project to be ended" and asks for "appraisal of the 10 acres" "certification of the class and attorney fees". Well Hutt has already crowed the property is worth a 1/2 a million an acre... WHERE"S HIS APPRAISAL ???  he's the one saying what it's worth ,but in the same breath asking for an appraisal...There is no way in hell that land will appraise for $500,000 an acre this is Jeffersonville not Manhattan. You would think someone filing suit would come to the table with just a little bit of proof like an appraisal instead he comes up with HIS figures....The old adage comes to mind  "Figures don't lie, but liars figure."

5. Finally Jabba the Hutt is baiting city attorney Les Merkley over the internet on the CCC. Merkley asked for an impartial Supreme Court judge for the suit and as mentioned earlier asked for a 24 million dollar bond.  Hutt is muttering in public "why is he (Merkley) hiding behind a 24 million dollar bond"and not wanting a local judge. This shows how stupid Hutt is, this is common practice in these type lawsuits he's not hiding from anything...Hutt's trying to hold up a 24 million dollar investment on his frivolous and untrue claims which is exactly why these bond requirements are in place, to stop any swinging D--- from holding up progress with bogus lawsuits. As far as the judge what's Hutt afraid of  ??? he say's it's all about the law ...who better to decide the law than an impartial Supreme court judge with no political ties to this area in what is a obviously a politically motivated lawsuit.

 It's time for Jabba the Hutt to put up or STFU.....and quit crying over the internet...Put your big boy panties on and  man up....

7 comments:

  1. Hutt "holding up the project" ?? Last reported, as I recall,is that the city council said no to the current plan. Has that changed ?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes it was approved with modifications I believe. Jaba da hutt would want his lunch buddy webber to be the judge.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't think Judge W. will want to associate with Hutt on this or any other political issue.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hutt is just a sad bitter old man who must not have much of a life to revolve his whole life around jeff politics.
    Hell go fish or take up golf.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It's better for Hutt to test his ideas in a fair and open Court.

    If he is right we will know.

    If he is wrong we will know.

    Goliath only worries if this is wrong and queers the current deal. That would be bad.

    Goliath hopes it is true so the Goliath Compound be worth about 500000 shekels just for parking lot.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Agreed G and a fair and open court is with a judge like requested by Mr. Merckley someone away from the local political scene....

    since politics is the main driver behind this suit...

    ReplyDelete
  7. If the City was selling property for 10% of it's value like Hutt claims...hell there would be people lined up for miles for that kind of deal...

    What was there 2 bidders ?? and the City took the highest bid. Seems pretty simple to me the land is no where near the worth Hutt claims....

    ReplyDelete