Saturday, March 21, 2015
Drug Court Controversy....Is There a Cover Up ???
As predicted by the BatBlog when the news first broke on the Clark Co. drug court controversy last year....no one was criminally charged from Judge Jerry Jacobi's staff and Jacobi himself got merely a slap on the wrist for his involvement in last year's drug court fiasco.
In exchange for Jacobi agreeing to never be a judge again, the judicial commission assigned to the case agreed to stop any further investigation into the incidents that spawned a federal lawsuit against Clark Co. by nearly 40 drug court defendants who have claimed rights violations.
Is there a cover up here ??? Damn right there is... Every voter, taxpayer and citizen in Clark Co. should be outraged about this curious decision to let Jacobi off the hook with out even following up on the allegations, These were serious allegations of false arrests, denying citizens of due process and their rights to an attorney. Several defendants were held in jail for months past their release time.
So we are left with basically no personal punishment evoked for denying these people their constitutional rights by a judge whose duty and oath was to uphold and apply law. By no charges being filed against the two fired employees the public will never know the complete story and facts that would have come forth in a trial of law. While we can guess that the two employees were simply following Jacobi's orders, we are left with questions instead of answers on the curious and convenient decision of investigators and the judicial commission NOT to charge or punish ANYONE in these disturbing actions.
The punishment will be dealt instead to the innocent taxpayers of Clark Co. who will more than likely have to pony up huge dollar amounts to the drug court defendants in their civil suit. The only thing Jacobi gets out of this whole mess is a legacy of being a "crooked" judge who may have been more guilty and a worse person than many of those he passed judgement on all those years he sat on the bench. And sadly there is not a damn thing we can do about it.....
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Wait... But everything was going to be different when Jeremy Mull became Prosecutor!
ReplyDeleteThis case has nothing to do with Mull it happened way before he was elected. The Indiana State police handled the investigation and came to the decision not to prosecute...It's asinine to try and pin this one on Mull...
ReplyDeleteYes. Mull had hands all over it.
ReplyDeleteHis deputy had veto power on it.
He has charging power. The ISP may indeed have decided not to prosecute, but THEY don't decide. The ONLY authority who has that power is Mull.
Note as well, Mull's office has been getting clobbered since he took over.
TWO major felony cases on Robbery since the beginning of the year. Results? One aquittal and one hung jury. Mull's own most recent case? Aquittal in November on high profile Murder case.
But, wait, they CAN prosecute old jail cases...and dummies getting asthma medication.
To what extent has the structure and personnel of the prosecutor's office changed since Mull was elected?
ReplyDeleteMy opinion there was no chance there was ever going to be any prosecution in this case by anyone involved. There would be finger pointing and blame thrown all over everywhere. Including the judge, sheriff's dept. and prosecutor's office....it would fuel the pending civil case and be a bloodbath of blame thrown around...
ReplyDeleteThe best case scenario for Clark Co. is for this to just be dropped like it was...not saying it's right because people want answers and Jacobi should be held accountable more than just saying he won't sit on the bench any more...
I'm giving Mull a pass on this because the ISP investigator came to the conclusion there wasn't enough evidence to prosecute and a prosecutor relies on the investigation to put his case together
Jeremy Mull had nothing to do with the decision not to charge Jeremy Snelling or Susan Koenble, as a special prosecutor was appointed to handle the case. The special prosecutor made the decision not to file charges. The special prosecutor was necessary because members of the Clark County Prosecutor's office were potentially witnesses in any case against the court employees. The decision not to continue the investigation against Judge Jacobi was made by the Indiana Judicial Qualifications Commission, at the State level. This is the entity which has jurisdiction over such matters involving Judges.
ReplyDelete